Ethics. Research. Community.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: should unresectable stage III patients routinely receive high-dose radiation therapy?

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 
6
(3): 
552-558; 
1988. 
(English). 
[Record Source: PubMed]
Non-small-cell lung cancer patients who have unresectable mediastinal disease have a poor prognosis regardless of therapy administered. The various rationales for high-dose radiation therapy with curative intent are reviewed in the context of treatment results reported in the literature. The case for a dose-cure relationship in a clinically practical dose range must be considered unproven. On the other hand, the evidence for dose-response effects suggests that higher dosages could result in improved quality of life. There is a need to further refine reproducible criteria, both anatomic (such as mediastinal involvement) and non-anatomic (such as performance status), to permit more appropriate selection of patients for high-dose treatment. Studies involving less rather than more treatment with appropriate endpoints might be both ethical and appropriate.
Access the full text from your libraries at your institution.  You will be navigating away from EthicShare.

Database Keywords

Detailed Record Information

Record TypeJournal Article
Record Source Status
[MEDLINE]
FormatsPrint
ISSN0732-183X